Why we have automated protection, how it works, and what it does — and does not — mean for your poems.
If you received a decline notice that mentioned automated filtering, IP blocks, or security measures, this page is for you. We know how alarming it is to wonder whether a machine rejected your poetry, or whether you — or your entire country — have been blacklisted. The short answer is: no human poet is blacklisted, no country is permanently blocked, and if your poem spent any real time in our reading queue, it was read and declined by a human editor on its merits. The longer answer follows.
Three Line Poetry has no submission fee. We believe poetry should be accessible to everyone, everywhere, and we have kept submissions free since 2011. Unfortunately, a free, open submission form on the internet is also a target.
We occasionally get bursts of fake submissions and brute-force attacks — sometimes thousands per second — from networks of IP addresses controlled by AI bots and scammers. These are not poets. They are automated scripts hammering the form with gibberish, spam, and credential-stuffing attempts.
If our editors had to wade through every fake submission by hand, the volume would bury the genuine poems and, frankly, it would bankrupt us. Automated protection during an attack is the only way we can keep submissions free for real poets. That trade is worth being transparent about, which is why this page exists.
The security mechanism is not always on. It turns on for a brief time when the site is being abused, and then turns back off when the attack is over. While it is on, it scales with the attack:
And then it drops off. When the attack ends, the blocks are lifted. There is no permanent blacklist of any country. We are an international journal and we welcome poets from anywhere in the world — the same country that is briefly blocked during an attack on a Tuesday is fully welcome again when the attack subsides.
During an attack, the system is supposed to reject fake submissions before the editors ever see them. This matters for telling an automated rejection apart from a real editorial decision:
Truly automated rejections happen within a minute or two of the submission. If your poem sat in the queue for any length of time beyond that before a decision arrived, it was not rejected by the security system — it sat in the slush pile and was read and declined by a human editor, the same way every other poem is.
Some poets received a decline notice that included a note about automated filtering or IP blocks even though their poem had been pending for a long time. Here is exactly what happened, because you deserve a straight answer:
We would call that a bug, and we apologize for the confusion it caused. The note should only ever accompany genuinely automated rejections — the ones that happen within minutes of a submission during an active attack — and never an editorial decline of a poem that was submitted in peacetime and read by a person.
If anything about a notice you received still doesn't make sense, contact the editors and we will look at your specific submission. We would rather answer the same question a hundred times than have one genuine poet walk away thinking a machine turned them down.
← Back to the FAQ